lunes, 27 de febrero de 2012

La UNESCO debe cancelar el Premio Obiang en forma definitiva


Sectores críticos repudian propuesta de Obiang de adoptar un nuevo nombre para el premio

(París, 27 de febrero de 2012) – Durante su próxima reunión, el Consejo Ejecutivo de la UNESCO debería abolir un premio financiado por el presidente Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo de Guinea Ecuatorial y que lleva su nombre, señalaron hoy siete organizaciones de la sociedad civil. Está previsto que el Consejo adopte una decisión definitiva sobre el premio durante la sesión que tendrá lugar en París del 27 de febrero al 10 de marzo de 2012.

La UNESCO ha pospuesto en varias oportunidades cualquier determinación sobre el premio ante las voces que se alzaron en todo el mundo en contra del presidente Obiang, cuyo mandato ha estado asociado con altos niveles de corrupción, represión y pobreza en Guinea Ecuatorial. En septiembre de 2011, la directora general de la UNESCO, Irina Bokova, instó al presidente Obiang a cancelar el premio como una “prueba de generosidad” con la organización. En noviembre, el Gobierno de Guinea Ecuatorial anunció en cambio que el presidente Obiang estaba dispuesto a “renunciar” a que el premio de investigación en ciencias de la vida, creado en 2008, “lleve su nombre”. Las organizaciones de la sociedad civil indicaron que la UNESCO debería rechazar rotundamente esa propuesta.

“El premio UNESCO-Obiang está asociado de manera irreversible con la represión y el alto nivel de corrupción que caracterizan al gobierno del presidente Obiang”, afirmó el arzobispo Desmond Tutu, ganador del Premio Nobel quien ha repudiado el premio en numerosas oportunidades. “Dar un nuevo nombre al premio no ofrece ninguna respuesta a estos señalamientos ni disipa las dudas sobre el origen de los fondos con los cuales se financia”.

Diversas organizaciones de la sociedad civil y personas destacadas que se han opuesto al premio UNESCO-Obiang han hecho hincapié en que la campaña global para conseguir su cancelación no tiene que ver solamente con el nombre. Varias personas que fueron galardonadas con el Premio Mundial de Libertad de Prensa Guillermo Cano, por ejemplo, se manifestaron en contra del premio UNESCO-Obiang y señalaron que el régimen autoritario del presidente Obiang no es compatible con el trabajo llevado a cabo por la UNESCO a favor de la libertad de expresión. El Gobierno de Guinea Ecuatorial no permite que periodistas de medios estatales transmitan información crítica sobre el presidente Obiang y, como resultado, numerosos ciudadanos no tienen acceso a noticias sobre la controversia en torno a este premio.

Las investigaciones sobre corrupción que se encuentran actualmente en curso en Francia, España y Estados Unidos contra el presidente Obiang, algunos de sus familiares o sus socios más cercanos aumenta las preocupaciones de que la corrupción se encuentra arraigada en los más altos niveles del Gobierno de Guinea Ecuatorial. En septiembre, las autoridades francesas decomisaron 11 lujosos automóviles valorados en más de US$ 5 millones que pertenecen al hijo mayor del presidente Obiang, Teodoro Nguema Obiang (“Teodorín”), y que se encontraban en una mansión en un exclusivo distrito de París donde este último reside cuando se encuentra en Francia. La confiscación se produjo a poca distancia de la sede de la UNESCO, donde algunos días después varios delegados reiteraron su decisión anterior de suspender este controvertido premio.

El 14 de febrero, las autoridades francesas dieron comienzo a una segunda requisa en la residencia de Obiang en París en el marco de una investigación por presuntos actos de malversación. Durante la requisa, que concluyó el 23 de febrero, la policía habría incautado al menos dos camiones con valiosas antigüedades y obras de arte compradas por Teodorín. Según versiones de la prensa, se cree que estos artículos tendrían un valor no menor a 40 millones de euros.

En octubre, el Departamento de Justicia de Estados Unidos presentó un recurso para decomisar bienes por un valor de más de US$ 70 millones que pertenecen a Teodorín, y sostuvo que este compró los artículos con fondos obtenidos a través de “extorsión y/o apropiacion indebida, robo o malversación de fondos públicos”.
Los abogados de Teodorín en Francia y Estados Unidos han impugnado las denuncias contra su cliente.

El 13 de octubre, pocos días después de que la UNESCO acordara extender la suspensión del premio, el presidente Obiang nombró a Teodorín como delegado permanente adjunto del país ante la UNESCO. Según la opinión general, la decisión no es más que un intento por conseguir que reciba inmunidad diplomática en Francia.
“El presidente Obiang pretende utilizar a la UNESCO en forma indebida para mejorar su imagen y proteger a su hijo de problemas legales”, afirmó Tutu Alicante, director de la organización no gubernamental EGJustice y exiliado de Guinea Ecuatorial. “La UNESCO debería revocar el premio Obiang y enviar así un mensaje rotundo de que su nombre no se vende al mejor postor”.

Cientos de personas y decenas de organizaciones, muchas de ellas de países africanos, se opusieron a este controvertido premio y exigieron que el monto de US$3 millones se utilice en cambio para mitigar los altos niveles de pobreza que existen en este país petrolero.

Según el Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2011 de las Naciones Unidas, el producto bruto interno (PBI) per cápita de Guinea Ecuatorial, de US$ 31,779, es equiparable al de Japón e Italia, y se posiciona por debajo del de Francia con una diferencia de tan sólo US$ 2,000. A pesar de esto, las precarias condiciones de vida ubican a Guinea Ecuatorial en el puesto 136 entre los 187 países en el Índice de Desarrollo Humano, y lo convierten en el país con la brecha más profunda entre el nivel de riqueza y su desempeño en materia de desarrollo humano.

Las siete organizaciones que suscriben la declaración difundida el día de hoy para instar una vez más a la UNESCO a poner fin al premio Obiang son:

Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos de España
Association Sherpa
Comité para la Protección de los Periodistas
EG Justice
Global Witness
Human Rights Watch
Open Society Justice Initiative

Para obtener más información, comuníquese con las siguientes personas:
En Tampa, FL, para EG Justice, Tutu Alicante (inglés, francés, español), +1-615-479-0207 (celular); o tutu@egjustice.org
En Washington, DC, para EG Justice, Joseph Kraus (inglés, español), +1-202-256-8939 (celular); o jkraus@egjustice.org
En Madrid, para APDHE, Manuel Ollé / Nuria García (español), 00 34 914022312, o legal@apdhe.org



viernes, 24 de febrero de 2012

Premio Unesco-Obiang


BRIEFING PAPER
Abusing UNESCO: President Teodoro Obiang of Equatorial Guinea
FEBRUARY 2012
THIS BRIEFING PAPER EXAMINES the on-going effort by President Teodoro Obiang of Equatorial Guinea to abuse the reputation and standing of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) by
  •   Using the establishment of a UNESCO science prize to launder the image of his regime, which is accused of extensive human rights abuses, and which has several senior officials who are subjects of at least three separate anti-corruption investigations in the US and Europe; and
  •   Appointing his son as Equatorial Guinea’s Deputy Permanent Delegate to UNESCO, which could endow him with diplomatic immunity in the face of criminal money laundering investigations in France.

The UNESCO-Obiang Prize
The UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences was approved in October 2008 when the Executive Board of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) accepted the offer of $3 million from President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo of Equatorial Guinea to endow an award in his name.i
The prize was scheduled to be awarded in June 2010, but was suspended indefinitely by the UNESCO Executive Board in October 2010 due to a lack of consensus among members as to
whether to proceed with the prize in light of significant allegations of human rights abuses and corruption relayed by civil society and government leaders.
Following a failed attempt to reinstate the prize in May 2011, President Obiang, then chairman of the African Union, secured an AU resolution calling for implementation of the prize in June 2011.ii UNESCO again deferred decision on the prize in October 2011, creating a working group to deliberate and come to a final conclusion at the next Executive Board meeting, February 27 to March 10, 2012.iii
Problems with the Prize
  •   President Obiang’s record of serious human rights violations and corruption is antithetical to UNESCO’s mission and values, and inconsistent with the stated humanitarian objective of the prize itself.
  •   The propriety and legality of the money provided to fund the UNESCO-Obiang Prize is in question, with official prize establishing documents contradictorily attributing funding of the prize to both a previously unknown foundation and the government of Equatorial Guinea.iv President Obiang and certain of his family members and close associates are subjects of on- going criminal and civil proceedings related to alleged money laundering and corruption in France, Spain and the US.
  •   Inquiries with UNESCO’s Internal Oversight Service Investigation Section (IOS) reveal that UNESCO currently has no process to screen funds to prevent money laundering, and so cannot ensure it does not accept funds that are the proceeds of corrupt practices. IOS declined to investigate a formal complaint filed by the Justice Initiative and three partner civil society organizations in June 2010 which documented these concerns.v
Solution: Cancel the Prize
  •   UNESCO Director-General Bokova and Executive Board Members should, at the February- March 2012 board session, cancel the UNESCO-Obiang Prize definitively.
  •   UNESCO should also establish effective policies and procedures for vetting prizes, their donors, and their sources of funding to avoid similar situations in the future. This should include consideration of the “integrity and identity” of the donor, as recommended by the UNESCO Working Group on Prizes.vi
OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE UNESCO and President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea |2|
Prominent individuals including Archbishop Desmond Tutu, author Chinua Achebe, several Nobel laureates such as Wole Soyinka, Mario Vargas Llosa, J.M.G. Le Clézio, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji and John Polanyi, and UNESCO prize winners from around the world have expressed outrage at the establishment of the UNESCO-Obiang prize and called for its cancellation. Various governments and parliamentarians have also registered serious concern about the prize and a broad coalition of human rights, press freedom, anticorruption, and public health organizations are campaigning for UNESCO to pull the award.vii
Teodorin and UNESCO
On October 13, 2011, Equatorial Guinea (EG) President Teodoro Obiang announced his eldest son Teodorin would serve as Equatorial Guinea’s Permanent Deputy Delegate to UNESCO.viii The
move swiftly followed a clear indication by French authorities that the biens mal acquis criminal money laundering case initiated by French NGOs Association Sherpa and Transparence International Franceix would reach Teodorin: per an order from an investigating magistrate on the case, the French National Police seized 11 of Teodorin’s “supercars” in Paris just weeks before, on September 27.x Videos of the lavish parade of automobiles spread rapidly on the internet.xi
Diplomatic immunity is provided to UNESCO delegates, and might therefore shield Teodorin from ongoing criminal investigations, particularly in France.
On February 14, 2012, when French National Police searched the Obiangs’ luxurious Avenue Foch mansion, a lawyer for the EG government reportedly sought to stop the search claiming it was a violation of Teodorin’s diplomatic immunity as Equatoguinean representative to UNESCO.xii
This is not the first time that UNESCO diplomatic status has been employed in an effort to foil anticorruption proceedings. During the Angolagate corruption scandal in France, international arms dealer Pierre Falcone was appointed Angolan ambassador to UNESCO -- a strategy that ultimately failed in part because of Falcone's French citizenship.xiii
Background: Widespread Poverty despite Vast National Wealth
Teodoro Obiang has ruled Equatorial Guinea for more than 30 years by suppressing dissent and
maintaining tight control over the country’s wealth. Under his leadership, Equatorial Guinea’s
people endure grinding poverty, while oil money flows into the private bank accounts of Obiang family members and their affiliates.
The disparity between Equatorial Guinea’s vast national wealth and its widespread poverty is
unmatched anywhere in the world according to recent UN figures. As sub-Saharan Africa’s third largest oil producer, sparsely populated Equatorial Guinea boasts the highest per capita Gross National Income (GNI) in Africa—$17,608. Yet under President Obiang’s rule, Equatorial Guinea has some of the lowest health and education levels in the world.xiv Most of the population is mired in desperate poverty, with more than 60 percent living on less than $1 per day according to the United Nations Development Assistance Framework.xv Indeed, in the UNDP’s 2011 Human Development Report, Equatorial Guinea was the worst governed country of all surveyed, as measured by the disconnect between available wealth and development.xvi
OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE UNESCO and President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea |3|
In the face of widespread national poverty, the Equatoguinean government has recently invested heavily in building showcase luxury infrastructure projects. In June 2011, the government completed the $830 million Sipopo, a luxury resort built to host the African Union Summit. Sipopo, covering over 3 million square meters, features a private mile-long artificial beach, 52 beach-front villas, an 18-hole golf course and the country’s first spa.xvii This year, Equatorial Guinea co-hosted the high profile Africa Cup of Nations. The total cost of the tournament is not publicly known, but renovating one stadium, building another and constructing a road to it cost $100 million alone, according to the government’s own reporting.xviii The country, with a population barely reaching 700,000, also boasts more than half a dozen luxury presidential palaces (built or under construction).xix
Oppression and Rights Abuses
In August 2010, President Obiang’s government executed four political dissidents after kidnapping them from exile in neighboring Benin and convicting them in a summary military trial, based on confessions that, according to Amnesty International, had been extracted under torture. In January 2010, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, Manfred Nowak, “found that torture [was] systematically used by the police forces against persons who refuse to ‘cooperate’—persons suspected of political crimes as well as suspects of common crimes” and noted that some prisoners suspected of political crimes were being held in solitary confinement for up to four years, almost always shackled at the legs.xx
Civil rights and political freedoms within the country are heavily repressed. In November 2011, human rights groups complained that a referendum to amend the constitution and strengthen Obiang’s rule was “deeply flawed” and was marred by numerous irregularities and voter fraud.xxi In a supposed multi-party democracy, only a single opposition party, Convergencia para la Democracia Social (CPDS), has representation in parliament -- holding only one of the parliament’s 100 seats. CPDS campaigners frequently face intimidation and harassment by police and are limited by the ruling party’s monopoly on power, funding and access to media.xxii In 2003, state radio described President Obiang as “the country’s God...[with] all power over men and things.”xxiii The President’s son, Teodorin, owns the only private broadcast media.xxiv
Corruption: Ongoing Investigations and Cases
Grand corruption in Equatorial Guinea is well-documented. Past and ongoing investigations by reliable government authorities in the United States, France, and Spain into the activities of President Obiang and his close associates help substantiate what many have suspected: a small group at the top of Equatoguinean society and government diverts to itself much of the country’s billions in oil revenues and other natural resource earnings.
United States
Investigations by the United States Senate in 2004 and 2010 found that large sums of Equatorial
Guinea’s oil income and other resource revenues ended up in private bank accounts in the United
States, Spain, Luxembourg and elsewhere, or were squandered on mansions and other extravagances for senior officials and their families. In October 2011, the US Department of Justice filed civil forfeiture complaints against approximately $70.8 million in real and personal property belonging to Teodorin, alleging crimes of money laundering, and extortion, theft, embezzlement and/or misappropriation of public funds. According to the complaint, despite an official government salary of less than $100,000 per year, Teodorin amassed more than $100
OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE UNESCO and President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea |4|
million as one of the few, near-exclusive beneficiaries of the extraction and sale of Equatorial Guinea’s natural resources.xxv
Spain
France
Following the 2004 U.S. Senate report, investigations by the Spanish NGO Asociación pro Derechos Humanos de España (APDHE) and the Open Society Justice Initiative uncovered evidence suggesting that as much as $26 million of Equatoguinean Treasury funds may have been applied to the purchase of real estate in Spain for the account of President Obiang and top government officials. These allegations are now under investigation by instructing magistrates in Grand Canary, Spain.xxvi
Pursuant to a complaint filed by Transparence International France against President Obiang and
his associates for concealment of diversion of public funds,xxvii a police investigation commenced in June 2007xxviii that confirmed Obiang family ownership of a high-end residence in Paris and found eight luxury automobiles belonging to his son Teodorin, including two Ferraris, two Bugattis, two Maseratis, a Maybach, and a Rolls Royce, for a total value of over €4 million.xxix
After a four-year long legal battle, in November 2010, the Cour de Cassation granted admissibility of the complaint and opened a judicial investigation. On September 27, 2011, while the Obiang prize was being debated at the UNESCO board, French police seized 11 luxury cars in Paris belonging to Teodorin pursuant to these investigations.
During the week of February 14, 2012, the police seized tens of millions of dollars worth of antiques, art works and other luxury goods from the Obiangs’ Avenue Foch residence, including a €1.5 million Louis XIV desk. The building itself is reportedly worth more than €500 million.xxx
i Establishment of the UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences, 180 EX/57, Paris, 29 September 2008, pp. 1-2. The establishing resolution states both that the “government” proposed to fund ii African Union Assembly Decision, Assembly/AU/Dec.389(XVII), available at: http://au.int/en/sites/default/files/Assembly_AU_Dec_363-390_(XVII)__E.pdf, at pp. 3, 45.
iii See Yojana Sharma,“UNESCO puts controversial Obiang prize on hold, again,” Science and Development Network (October 5, 2011), available at: http://www.scidev.net/en/science-and-innovation-policy/science-policy/news/unesco-puts- controversial-obiang-prize-on-hold-again-1.html.
iv Establishment of the UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences, 180 EX/57, Paris, 29 September 2008, pp. 1-2.
v See complaint and follow-up letters sent to UNESCO IOS, prize working group and Executive Board members, available at: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/news/unesco-obiang-investigation-20100928.
vi Ibid, paras 20 & 23.
vii See Open Society Justice Initiative, “UNESCO Suspends Dictator Prize after Global Protest” (October 21, 2010), http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/news/unesco-suspends-obiang-prize-20101021. See also, for example, Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s statement, http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/news/desmond-tutu-unesco-obiang-20100611; public health community protest, http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/news/health-unesco-obiang-20100526; letter signed by Nobel laureate Mario Vargas Llosa and other prominent Latin American writers, http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/news/vargas-llosa-letter-unesco-20101007; and letter signed by other Nobel laureates and notable scientific and literary figures, http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/news/obiang-letter-20111003. viii See Equatorial Guinea presidential decree, available at: http://www.guineaecuatorialpress.com/noticia.php?id=1994.
ix See Association Sherpa’s summary of the biens mal acquis case, http://www.asso-sherpa.org/nos- programmes/ffid/campagne-ra/bma (French); statement on case by Transparence International (English), available at: http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases_nc/2010/2010_11_9_paris.
OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE UNESCO and President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea |5|
x “Ill-Gotten Assets: Many Supercars of Africa’s Dictator, T. Obiang Nguema M, Seized by French Police,” (September 30, 2011), available at: http://www.baselgovernance.org/big/news-single-view/archive/2011/august/article/ill-gotten-assets- many-supercars-of-africas-dictator-t-obiang-nguema-m-seized-by-french-polic/.
xi See, for example: Anthony Hernandez, “Football : la CAN, une arme diplomatique pour la Guinée équatoriale,” Le Monde, (January 25, 2012), available at: http://www.lemonde.fr/sport/article/2012/01/25/football-la-can-une-arme- diplomatique-pour-la-guinee-equatoriale_1633664_3242.html
xii See “French police search flat of E. Guinea president's son,” Agence France Presse (February 14, 2012), available at: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jXQiixK9JjQbBxVDlJx7jrrZgPsw?docId=CNG.020ab95fd734a20 34432628fe2fe29a7.2a1.
xiii “[Falcone’s] convictions included 'illicit arms trade, tax evasion’ and ‘influence peddling’. Falcone’s diplomatic immunity as Angola’s representative to UNESCO was disregarded due to the retrospective nature of the case as well as his French nationality,” Denis Carlier, “Angolagate: Top French officials jailed over Angola arms deal scandal,” Afrik-News (October 28, 2009), available at: http://www.afrik-news.com/article16380.html. In 2011, Falcone’s conviction for illicit arms trading was reversed on appeal, and his sentence reduced from six years to 30 months. David Gauthier-Villars, “Court Acquits 3 in Angola Arms Case,” Wall Street Journal (April 30, 2011), available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703655404576292732175208012.html.
xiv See generally Corruption and its Consequences in Equatorial Guinea, an Open Society Justice Initiative Briefing Paper, Updated (March 2010), p. 4, available at: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/articles_publications/publications/eqbriefing_20090721.
xv República de Guinea Ecuatorial y Sistema de las Naciones Unidas, Balance Común de Pais (CCA), Versión Validada (September 2006), p. 7. See also Système des Nations Unies, Cadre d’assistance des Nations Unies pour le développement (UNDAF) en Guinée Equatoriale pour la période 2008-2012 (February 12, 2007), p. 7, available at http://www.undg.org/docs/7228/undaf%20version%20finale%20(FR)%2020-02-2007.doc.
xvi UNDP 2011 Report, Table 1, p. 129. See second to last column, “GNI per capita rank minus HDI rank.” Equatorial Guinea’s value is -91.
xvii David Smith, “Equatorial Guinea builds luxury resort for week-long summit,” The Guardian (June 7, 2011), available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/07/equatorial-guinea-luxury-resort-sipopo.
xviiiSee Equatoguinean government 2005 response to the US Senate Riggs Bank investigation, document available at: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16118918/EG_Response_to_Riggs.pdf. Images of the two hosting stadiums available at: http://www.france-guineeequatoriale.org/Nzalang/Stades.html. The stadium-related costs, of course, do not include the $1 million bonuses to the Equatoguinean football team put up by Teodorin Obiang, the son of the president, along with a $20,000 bonus for every goal scored. See, David Smith, “Equatorial Guinea footballers’ $1m win bonus condemned by poverty activists,” The Guardian (January 20, 2012), available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jan/20/equatorial-guinea-footballers-win-bonus.
xix See Colum Lynch, “Obiang’s palace building spree,” Foreign Policy (February 9, 2011), available at http://turtlebay.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/12/08/obiangs_palace_building_spree; see also, for example, website of Ali Maroubet Engineering, at http://www.mourabet.com/projects-residential-palaces.html.
xx United Nations Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Manfred Nowak, Addendum: Mission to the Republic of Equatorial Guinea, A/HRC/13/39/Add.4 (January 7, 2010).
xxi See EG Justice and Human Rights Watch, “Flawed Vote,” (November 15, 2011), available at: http://egjustice.org/post/flawed-vote.
xxii “Equatorial Guinea: Secrecy, Intimidation Ahead of Vote for Constitutional Change,” Human Rights Watch press release (November 11, 2011), available at: http://allafrica.com/stories/201111110629.html
xxiii “Equatorial Guinea’s God,” BBC News (July 26, 2003), available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3098007.stm.
xxiv US Department of State, 2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices (April 18 2011), available at http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2010/af/154344.htm.
xxv United States Department of Justice, “Department of Justice Seeks to Recover More Than $70.8 Million in Proceeds of Corruption from Government Minister of Equatorial Guinea” (October 25, 2011), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/October/11-crm-1405.html.
xxvi Information on the Spanish case, including Spanish and English language versions of the complaint, is available on the Open Society Foundations website, at http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/litigation/obiangfamily.
xxvii Plainte avec constitution de partie civile (Criminal Complaint), Transparence International, France et Gregory Ngbwa Mintsa, Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (December 2, 2008).
xxviiiSee “Paris judge to examine African leaders' finances,” The Independent, (May 7, 2009), available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/paris-judge-to-examine-african-leaders-finances-1680808.html .
xxix See, e.g., “Le détail des biens présumés mal acquis de Bongo, Sassou et Obiang,” Jeune Afrique (May 7, 2009), available at http://www.jeuneafrique.com/Article/ARTJAWEB20090507150950/-justice-Denis-Sassou-Nguesso-Teodoro- Obiang-Omar-Bongo-Le-detail-des-biens-presumes-mal-acquis-de-Bongo-Sassou-et-Obiang-.html.
xxx See “Equatorial Guinea: Paris Police Seize Luxury Goods Worth Millions From Obiang Mansion,” RFI English (February 17, 2012), available at: http://allafrica.com/stories/201202171234.html
OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE UNESCO and President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea |6|
OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE UNESCO and President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea |7|
29 SeptEMBER 2008 Obiang Prize Established
The $3 million UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences, proposed by Equatorial Guinea’s President Obiang, is established to reward “scientific research in the life sciences leading to improving the quality of human life”1
26 May 2010
SCIENTISTS’ Call to Abolish prize
Public health and science professionals ask UNESCO to abolish the Obiang Prize, stating that “health indicators [in Equatorial Guinea] reflect shockingly poor governance and widespread suffering... [President Obiang] is cynically attempting to use UNESCO to legitimize his abusive regime.”2
June 2010 UNESCO Mission to EG
A high-level UNESCO mission visits President Obiang Nguema Mbasogo in Equatorial Guinea in order to reach an agreement to postpone the awarding of the prize3
10 June 2010
NGOs ask UNESCO to Investigate

Concerned that UNESCO may have accepted money representing proceeds of corruption, the Open Society Justice Initiative and other NGOs submit a request to UNESCO’s Internal Oversight Service to investigate the funding
for the prize4

Abusing UNESCO:
21 October 2010 OBIANG PRIZE SUSPENDED
UNESCO Executive Board indefinitely suspends the Obiang Prize9
11 October 2010 Africans denounce prize
African voices including those of Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka and author Chinua Achebe express their opposition to the Obiang prize, stating “the
continued existence of this prize is inimical to UNESCO’s mission and an affront to Africans everywhere who work for the betterment of our countries.”8
27 September 2010 EQuatorial Guinea Addresses UN
EG Minister of Foreign Affairs addresses the UN General Assembly, asserting that “this prize is still blocked simply because it is an initiative of an African leader... Equatorial Guinea denounces the manipulations and maneuvers of the new UNESCO administration against [this] humanitarian initiative.”7
15 June 2010 UNESCO Reacts
UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova expresses concern about the Obiang prize and decides to bring the matter before the Executive Board6
11 JUNE 2010 Desmond tutu criticizes prize
Archbishop Desmond Tutu calls on UNESCO to withdraw the Obiang Prize, writing: “UNESCO is a beacon for hope and development around the world. I am appalled that this organization, which holds such promise, is allowing itself to burnish the unsavory reputation of a dictator.”5
1 Establishment of the UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences, UNESCO 180 EX/57, Paris, 29 September 2008. 2 Enserink, Martin, “Scientists Join Protests Against Award in Honor of African Dictator”, Science Insider, 27 May 2010, available at: sciencemag.org
3 Implementation of 180 EX/Decision 57, UNESCO 187 EX/48, Paris, 14 September 2011, explanatory note 3.
4 “Request for Investigation”, Justice Initiative, APDHE, Sherpa and EG Justice, 10 June 2010, available at: www.soros.org
5 Tutu, Desmond M., “Statement on the UNESCO-Obiang Prize from Desmond Tutu”, 11 June 2010, available at: www.soros.org
6 The UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences, UNESCO 185 ex/47, Paris, 19 November 2010 , para. I.
7 “Statement By The Honorable Minister Of Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation And Francophonie Of The Republic Of Equatorial Guinea”, 29 September 2010,
available at: equatorialguineainfo.blogspot.com
8 “The UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Science”, 11 October 2010, available at: egjustice.or
9 The UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences, UNESCO 185 ex/47, Paris,19 November 2010 , para. 4.
President Teodoro Obiang of Equatorial Guinea
9 November 2010
French criminal investigation

French Cour de cassation grants admissibility of a criminal complaint filed by NGO Transparency international France against President Obiang and opens a judicial investigation10
JunE 2011
OBIANG SECURES AU RESOLUTION ON PRIZE

The Equatorial Guinea government builds the $830 million luxury resort Sipopo to host the African Union Summit11, where Obiang secures an AU resolution calling for implementation of the prize12
Spring 2012 UNESCO DECISION
UNESCO is slated to make a decision on the Obiang Prize at the 189th session of the Executive Board.
14 February 2012
French police raid Obiang mansion
French police again raid the Obiangs’ 101-room, €500 million Avenue Foch mansion, hauling out truckloads of luxury goods as suspected proceeds of corruption, including a Louis XIV desk worth €1.5 million17
25 October 2011
US Investigation of teodorin

US Department of Justice files civil forfeiture complaints targeting approximately $70.8 million of assets belonging to Teodorin, including a $35 million Malibu mansion, all allegedly representing proceeds of corruption16
27 September 2011
Luxury cars seized
In Paris, French National Police raid the Obiangs’ Avenue Foch residence and seize 11 “supercars” belonging to the son of President Obiang, Teodorin, totaling over €4 million13
October 2011 Obiang PRIZE DEFERRED AGAIN
UNESCO Executive Board again defers decision on the Obiang prize and etablishes a working group to reach a conclusion by Spring 201214
13 October 2011 Teodorin ambassador to UNESCO
In the face of ongoing criminal proceedings against his son Teodorin, President Obiang announces Teodorin will serve as Equatorial Guinea’s Permanent Deputy Delegate to UNESCO, a position which could give him diplomatic immunity15
10 “The complaint filed by Transparency International France is ruled admissible”, Transparency International, Paris, 9 November 2010, available at: www.transparency.org 11 David Smith, “Equatorial Guinea builds luxury resort for week-long summit”, The Guardian (7 June 2011), available at: www.guardian.co.uk
12 Implementation of 180 EX/Decision 57, UNESCO 187 EX/48, Paris, 14 September 2011, para 5.
13 “Biens mal acquis : la justice saisit des véhicules appartenant à la famille Obiang”, Le Monde (28 September 2011), available at: www.lemonde.fr
14 Implementation of 180 EX/Decision 57, UNESCO 187 EX/48, Paris, 14 September 2011, paras 7-8.
15 “El Ministro de Estado de Agricultura, nuevo Delegado Permanente Adjunto de Guinea Ecuatorial ante la UNESCO”, Guinea Ecuatorial Press (13 October 2011), available at: http://www.guineaecuatorialpress.com/noticia.php?id=1994
16 “Department of Justice Seeks to Recover More Than $70.8 Million in Proceeds of Corruption from Government Minister of Equatorial Guinea”, Department of Justice, 25 October 2011, available at: www.justice.govt
17 “Police raid Parisian home of son of Equatorial Guinea president Obiang”, RFI (14 February 2012), available at: http://www.english.rfi.fr/
E-mail: info@justiceinitiative.org www.justiceinitiative.org
The Open Society Justice Initiative uses law to protect and empower people around the world. Through litigation, advocacy, research, and technical assistance, the Justice Initiative promotes human rights and builds legal capacity for open societies. Our staff is based in Abuja, Amsterdam, Bishkek, Brussels, Budapest, Freetown, The Hague, London, Mexico City, New York, Paris, Phnom Penh, Santo Domingo, and Washington, D.C.